Skip to main content
ASEAN Football Championship · Friday, 24 July 2026

Cambodia v Singapore Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-29.0%
Expected goals1.35 – 1.59Cambodia / Singapore

Most likely scorelines

#11-113.2%
#21-29.0%
#32-17.7%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
07.1%6.5%6.7%3.5%1.4%
15.2%13.2%9.0%4.8%1.9%
24.8%7.7%6.1%3.2%1.3%
32.2%3.5%2.8%1.5%0.6%
40.7%1.2%0.9%0.5%0.2%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate9.0%
Model fair odds11.09
Recorded CS odds8.50
Bookmaker implied11.8%
Model-market gap-2.7 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-23.4%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published23 Jul 2026 · 18:26 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-2

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.53View odds
Both teams to score — No2.30View odds
Over 2.51.62View odds
Under 2.52.10View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Cambodia versus Singapore to finish 1-2. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. Before kick-off, check team news, line-ups and the live bookmaker price because circumstances and odds can change.

→ 1-2
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy