Skip to main content
Club Friendlies · Friday, 24 July 2026

Rosenborg v Man Utd Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score2-15.8%
Expected goals1.39 – 2.21Rosenborg / Man Utd

Most likely scorelines

#11-29.3%
#21-19.3%
#31-36.8%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
03.6%5.2%6.7%4.9%2.7%
12.9%9.3%9.3%6.8%3.8%
22.6%5.8%6.4%4.8%2.6%
31.2%2.7%3.0%2.2%1.2%
40.4%0.9%1.0%0.8%0.4%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate5.8%
Model fair odds17.15
Recorded CS odds13.00
Bookmaker implied7.7%
Model-market gap-1.9 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-24.2%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published23 Jul 2026 · 18:26 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 2-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.40View odds
Both teams to score — No2.80View odds
Over 2.51.30View odds
Under 2.53.10View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Rosenborg versus Man Utd to finish 2-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. Before kick-off, check team news, line-ups and the live bookmaker price because circumstances and odds can change.

→ 2-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy