Skip to main content
Swiss Challenge League · Friday, 24 July 2026

Xamax v Kriens Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score2-18.9%
Expected goals2.07 – 1.53Xamax / Kriens

Most likely scorelines

#11-110.0%
#22-18.9%
#32-26.9%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
04.1%2.8%3.2%1.6%0.6%
14.3%10.0%6.6%3.4%1.3%
25.8%8.9%6.9%3.5%1.3%
34.0%6.2%4.7%2.4%0.9%
42.1%3.2%2.4%1.2%0.5%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate8.9%
Model fair odds11.18
Recorded CS odds9.00
Bookmaker implied11.1%
Model-market gap-2.2 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-19.5%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published23 Jul 2026 · 18:26 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 2-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.35View odds
Both teams to score — No3.00View odds
Over 2.51.30View odds
Under 2.53.10View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Xamax versus Kriens to finish 2-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. Before kick-off, check team news, line-ups and the live bookmaker price because circumstances and odds can change.

→ 2-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy