Skip to main content
Norwegian OBOS-Ligaen · Saturday, 25 July 2026

Haugesund v Bryne Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score2-19.5%
Expected goals2.10 – 1.33Haugesund / Bryne

Most likely scorelines

#11-110.2%
#22-19.5%
#32-07.2%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
04.4%3.2%2.9%1.3%0.4%
15.7%10.2%6.0%2.6%0.9%
27.2%9.5%6.3%2.8%0.9%
35.0%6.7%4.4%2.0%0.6%
42.6%3.5%2.3%1.0%0.3%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate9.5%
Model fair odds10.52
Recorded CS odds8.50
Bookmaker implied11.8%
Model-market gap-2.3 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-19.2%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published24 Jul 2026 · 19:17 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 2-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.40View odds
Both teams to score — No2.62View odds
Over 2.51.36View odds
Under 2.52.80View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Haugesund versus Bryne to finish 2-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. Before kick-off, check team news, line-ups and the live bookmaker price because circumstances and odds can change.

→ 2-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy