Skip to main content
Norwegian 2. Division · Saturday, 25 July 2026

Honefoss v Skeid Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-110.6%
Expected goals2.00 – 1.27Honefoss / Skeid

Most likely scorelines

#11-110.6%
#22-19.6%
#32-07.6%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
04.7%3.9%3.1%1.3%0.4%
16.7%10.6%6.1%2.6%0.8%
27.6%9.6%6.1%2.6%0.8%
35.0%6.4%4.1%1.7%0.6%
42.5%3.2%2.0%0.9%0.3%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate10.6%
Model fair odds9.44
Recorded CS odds7.50
Bookmaker implied13.3%
Model-market gap-2.7 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-20.5%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published24 Jul 2026 · 19:17 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.44View odds
Both teams to score — No2.45View odds
Over 2.51.44View odds
Under 2.52.50View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Honefoss versus Skeid to finish 1-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. Before kick-off, check team news, line-ups and the live bookmaker price because circumstances and odds can change.

→ 1-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy