Skip to main content
Swiss Super League · Saturday, 25 July 2026

Luzern v Thun Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score2-19.0%
Expected goals1.90 – 1.50Luzern / Thun

Most likely scorelines

#11-110.8%
#22-19.0%
#31-27.1%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
04.6%3.8%3.8%1.9%0.7%
15.2%10.8%7.1%3.6%1.3%
26.0%9.0%6.8%3.4%1.3%
33.8%5.7%4.3%2.1%0.8%
41.8%2.7%2.0%1.0%0.4%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate9.0%
Model fair odds11.05
Recorded CS odds9.00
Bookmaker implied11.1%
Model-market gap-2.1 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-18.6%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published24 Jul 2026 · 19:17 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 2-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.40View odds
Both teams to score — No2.75View odds
Over 2.51.40View odds
Under 2.52.80View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Luzern versus Thun to finish 2-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. Before kick-off, check team news, line-ups and the live bookmaker price because circumstances and odds can change.

→ 2-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy