Skip to main content
Swedish Superettan · Saturday, 25 July 2026

Varnamo v Brage Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score2-33.0%
Expected goals1.64 – 1.42Varnamo / Brage

Most likely scorelines

#11-112.7%
#22-18.9%
#31-27.8%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
06.5%4.9%4.7%2.2%0.8%
16.0%12.7%7.8%3.7%1.3%
26.3%8.9%6.3%3.0%1.1%
33.4%4.9%3.5%1.6%0.6%
41.4%2.0%1.4%0.7%0.2%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate3.0%
Model fair odds33.29
Recorded CS odds21.00
Bookmaker implied4.8%
Model-market gap-1.8 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-36.9%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published24 Jul 2026 · 19:17 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 2-3

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.44View odds
Both teams to score — No2.50View odds
Over 2.51.57View odds
Under 2.52.25View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Varnamo versus Brage to finish 2-3. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. Before kick-off, check team news, line-ups and the live bookmaker price because circumstances and odds can change.

→ 2-3
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy