Skip to main content
Danish 1st Division · Sunday, 26 July 2026

Hobro v Aarhus Fremad Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-113.9%
Expected goals1.34 – 1.34Hobro / Aarhus Fremad

Most likely scorelines

#11-113.9%
#20-08.4%
#31-28.3%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
08.4%7.6%6.1%2.8%0.9%
17.6%13.9%8.3%3.7%1.2%
26.1%8.3%5.5%2.5%0.8%
32.8%3.7%2.5%1.1%0.4%
40.9%1.2%0.8%0.4%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate13.9%
Model fair odds7.22
Recorded CS odds6.00
Bookmaker implied16.7%
Model-market gap-2.8 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-16.9%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published25 Jul 2026 · 19:24 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.62View odds
Both teams to score — No2.15View odds
Over 2.51.83View odds
Under 2.51.85View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Hobro versus Aarhus Fremad to finish 1-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. Before kick-off, check team news, line-ups and the live bookmaker price because circumstances and odds can change.

→ 1-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy