Skip to main content
Swedish Allsvenskan · Monday, 27 July 2026

Hacken v AIK Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score2-26.4%
Expected goals1.92 – 1.35Hacken / AIK

Most likely scorelines

#11-110.8%
#22-19.5%
#32-07.0%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
04.7%4.2%3.5%1.6%0.5%
16.4%10.8%6.7%3.0%1.0%
27.0%9.5%6.4%2.9%1.0%
34.5%6.0%4.1%1.8%0.6%
42.1%2.9%2.0%0.9%0.3%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate6.4%
Model fair odds15.66
Recorded CS odds11.00
Bookmaker implied9.1%
Model-market gap-2.7 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-29.7%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published26 Jul 2026 · 16:14 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 2-2

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.44View odds
Both teams to score — No2.50View odds
Over 2.51.44View odds
Under 2.52.50View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Hacken versus AIK to finish 2-2. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. Before kick-off, check team news, line-ups and the live bookmaker price because circumstances and odds can change.

→ 2-2
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy