Skip to main content
Swedish Superettan · Monday, 27 July 2026

Oster v Varberg Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-112.5%
Expected goals1.45 – 1.64Oster / Varberg

Most likely scorelines

#11-112.5%
#21-28.9%
#32-17.8%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
06.3%5.7%6.1%3.4%1.4%
14.9%12.5%8.9%4.9%2.0%
24.8%7.8%6.4%3.5%1.4%
32.3%3.8%3.1%1.7%0.7%
40.8%1.4%1.1%0.6%0.3%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate12.5%
Model fair odds7.99
Recorded CS odds6.50
Bookmaker implied15.4%
Model-market gap-2.9 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-18.6%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published26 Jul 2026 · 16:14 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.44View odds
Both teams to score — No2.50View odds
Over 2.51.55View odds
Under 2.52.30View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Oster versus Varberg to finish 1-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. Before kick-off, check team news, line-ups and the live bookmaker price because circumstances and odds can change.

→ 1-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy