Skip to main content
Latvian Virsliga · Monday, 27 July 2026

Tukums v Rigas FS Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-29.4%
Expected goals0.86 – 2.46Tukums / Rigas FS

Most likely scorelines

#10-211.0%
#21-29.4%
#30-39.0%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
04.8%7.7%11.0%9.0%5.5%
11.9%8.8%9.4%7.7%4.7%
21.3%3.3%4.0%3.3%2.0%
30.4%0.9%1.1%0.9%0.6%
40.1%0.2%0.2%0.2%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate9.4%
Model fair odds10.64
Recorded CS odds8.50
Bookmaker implied11.8%
Model-market gap-2.4 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-20.1%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published26 Jul 2026 · 16:14 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-2

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.73View odds
Both teams to score — No2.00View odds
Over 2.51.40View odds
Under 2.52.62View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Tukums versus Rigas FS to finish 1-2. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. Before kick-off, check team news, line-ups and the live bookmaker price because circumstances and odds can change.

→ 1-2
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy