Skip to main content
Swedish Superettan · Tuesday, 28 July 2026

Landskrona v Norrkoping Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-112.6%
Expected goals1.28 – 1.60Landskrona / Norrkoping

Most likely scorelines

#11-112.6%
#21-29.2%
#30-17.9%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
06.7%7.9%7.2%3.8%1.5%
16.1%12.6%9.2%4.9%2.0%
24.6%7.4%5.9%3.2%1.3%
32.0%3.2%2.5%1.4%0.5%
40.6%1.0%0.8%0.4%0.2%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate12.6%
Model fair odds7.97
Recorded CS odds6.50
Bookmaker implied15.4%
Model-market gap-2.8 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-18.4%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published27 Jul 2026 · 19:08 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.57View odds
Both teams to score — No2.25View odds
Over 2.51.67View odds
Under 2.52.05View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Landskrona versus Norrkoping to finish 1-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. Before kick-off, check team news, line-ups and the live bookmaker price because circumstances and odds can change.

→ 1-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy