Skip to main content
Norwegian Eliteserien · Friday, 31 July 2026

Bodo/Glimt v Lillestrom Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score3-08.5%
Expected goals2.78 – 0.96Bodo/Glimt / Lillestrom

Most likely scorelines

#12-09.2%
#22-18.8%
#33-08.5%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
02.4%2.2%1.1%0.4%0.1%
16.5%6.4%3.0%1.0%0.2%
29.2%8.8%4.2%1.4%0.3%
38.5%8.2%3.9%1.3%0.3%
45.9%5.7%2.7%0.9%0.2%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate8.5%
Model fair odds11.76
Recorded CS odds9.00
Bookmaker implied11.1%
Model-market gap-2.6 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-23.4%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published30 Jul 2026 · 18:38 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 3-0

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.60View odds
Both teams to score — No2.25View odds
Over 2.51.30View odds
Under 2.53.25View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Bodo/Glimt versus Lillestrom to finish 3-0. That scoreline implies No for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. Before kick-off, check team news, line-ups and the live bookmaker price because circumstances and odds can change.

→ 3-0
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy