Skip to main content
Swiss Challenge League · Friday, 31 July 2026

Wil v Xamax Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score3-23.7%
Expected goals1.68 – 1.50Wil / Xamax

Most likely scorelines

#11-112.0%
#22-18.8%
#31-27.9%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
05.6%4.8%4.7%2.3%0.9%
15.5%12.0%7.9%3.9%1.5%
25.9%8.8%6.6%3.3%1.2%
33.3%4.9%3.7%1.8%0.7%
41.4%2.1%1.5%0.8%0.3%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate3.7%
Model fair odds27.09
Recorded CS odds17.00
Bookmaker implied5.9%
Model-market gap-2.2 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-37.3%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published30 Jul 2026 · 18:38 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 3-2

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.44View odds
Both teams to score — No2.62View odds
Over 2.51.50View odds
Under 2.52.40View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Wil versus Xamax to finish 3-2. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. Before kick-off, check team news, line-ups and the live bookmaker price because circumstances and odds can change.

→ 3-2
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy