Skip to main content
Club Friendlies · Saturday, 1 August 2026

Chelsea v Tottenham Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score3-15.1%
Expected goals1.75 – 1.56Chelsea / Tottenham

Most likely scorelines

#11-111.8%
#22-18.7%
#31-27.8%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
05.5%3.9%4.4%2.3%0.9%
14.5%11.8%7.8%4.1%1.6%
25.6%8.7%6.8%3.6%1.4%
33.2%5.1%4.0%2.1%0.8%
41.4%2.2%1.7%0.9%0.4%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate5.1%
Model fair odds19.68
Recorded CS odds13.00
Bookmaker implied7.7%
Model-market gap-2.6 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-33.9%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published31 Jul 2026 · 18:39 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 3-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.36View odds
Both teams to score — No2.80View odds
Over 2.51.44View odds
Under 2.52.60View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Chelsea versus Tottenham to finish 3-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. Before kick-off, check team news, line-ups and the live bookmaker price because circumstances and odds can change.

→ 3-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy