Skip to main content
Norwegian Eliteserien · Saturday, 1 August 2026

Start v Viking Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-51.6%
Expected goals1.08 – 2.15Start / Viking

Most likely scorelines

#11-110.0%
#21-29.9%
#30-29.2%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
04.8%7.7%9.2%6.6%3.5%
13.4%10.0%9.9%7.1%3.8%
22.3%5.0%5.3%3.8%2.1%
30.8%1.8%1.9%1.4%0.7%
40.2%0.5%0.5%0.4%0.2%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate1.6%
Model fair odds61.04
Recorded CS odds34.00
Bookmaker implied2.9%
Model-market gap-1.3 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-44.3%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published31 Jul 2026 · 18:39 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-5

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.62View odds
Both teams to score — No2.20View odds
Over 2.51.44View odds
Under 2.52.50View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Start versus Viking to finish 1-5. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. Before kick-off, check team news, line-ups and the live bookmaker price because circumstances and odds can change.

→ 1-5
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy