Skip to main content
Swiss Super League · Saturday, 1 August 2026

Zurich v Servette Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-111.4%
Expected goals1.33 – 1.78Zurich / Servette

Most likely scorelines

#11-111.4%
#21-29.4%
#30-17.1%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
05.3%7.1%7.1%4.2%1.9%
15.1%11.4%9.4%5.6%2.5%
24.0%7.0%6.2%3.7%1.6%
31.8%3.1%2.8%1.6%0.7%
40.6%1.0%0.9%0.5%0.2%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate11.4%
Model fair odds8.74
Recorded CS odds7.00
Bookmaker implied14.3%
Model-market gap-2.8 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-19.9%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published31 Jul 2026 · 18:39 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.53View odds
Both teams to score — No2.38View odds
Over 2.51.53View odds
Under 2.52.38View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Zurich versus Servette to finish 1-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. Before kick-off, check team news, line-ups and the live bookmaker price because circumstances and odds can change.

→ 1-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy