Skip to main content
Swedish Division 1 · Sunday, 2 August 2026

Trelleborg v Lund BK Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score2-19.8%
Expected goals1.82 – 1.08Trelleborg / Lund BK

Most likely scorelines

#11-111.9%
#22-19.8%
#32-09.2%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
06.6%4.8%3.2%1.1%0.3%
18.9%11.9%5.8%2.1%0.6%
29.2%9.8%5.3%1.9%0.5%
35.6%6.0%3.2%1.2%0.3%
42.5%2.7%1.5%0.5%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate9.8%
Model fair odds10.15
Recorded CS odds7.50
Bookmaker implied13.3%
Model-market gap-3.5 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-26.1%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published1 Aug 2026 · 19:00 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 2-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.62View odds
Both teams to score — No2.10View odds
Over 2.51.65View odds
Under 2.52.05View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Trelleborg versus Lund BK to finish 2-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. Before kick-off, check team news, line-ups and the live bookmaker price because circumstances and odds can change.

→ 2-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy