Skip to main content
Icelandic Urvalsdeild · Monday, 3 August 2026

Valur v Stjarnan Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score3-24.7%
Expected goals1.93 – 1.83Valur / Stjarnan

Most likely scorelines

#11-19.8%
#22-17.9%
#31-27.5%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
03.9%2.7%3.9%2.4%1.1%
12.9%9.8%7.5%4.6%2.1%
24.3%7.9%7.3%4.4%2.0%
32.8%5.1%4.7%2.9%1.3%
41.3%2.5%2.3%1.4%0.6%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate4.7%
Model fair odds21.42
Recorded CS odds15.00
Bookmaker implied6.7%
Model-market gap-2.0 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-30.0%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published2 Aug 2026 · 18:40 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 3-2

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.29View odds
Both teams to score — No3.40View odds
Over 2.51.25View odds
Under 2.53.40View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Valur versus Stjarnan to finish 3-2. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. Before kick-off, check team news, line-ups and the live bookmaker price because circumstances and odds can change.

→ 3-2
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy