Skip to main content
Icelandic Urvalsdeild · Wednesday, 5 August 2026

Keflavik v KA Akureyri Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-19.9%
Expected goals1.97 – 1.71Keflavik / KA Akureyri

Most likely scorelines

#11-19.9%
#22-18.4%
#31-27.3%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
03.9%2.9%3.7%2.1%0.9%
13.6%9.9%7.3%4.1%1.8%
24.9%8.4%7.2%4.1%1.7%
33.2%5.5%4.7%2.7%1.1%
41.6%2.7%2.3%1.3%0.6%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate9.9%
Model fair odds10.09
Recorded CS odds9.00
Bookmaker implied11.1%
Model-market gap-1.2 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-10.8%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published4 Aug 2026 · 19:13 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.30View odds
Both teams to score — No3.25View odds
Over 2.51.30View odds
Under 2.53.30View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Keflavik versus KA Akureyri to finish 1-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 3-0, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy