Skip to main content
Polish FA Cup · Wednesday, 5 August 2026

Warta Poznan v Resovia Rzeszow Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score2-25.2%
Expected goals1.96 – 1.05Warta Poznan / Resovia Rzeszow

Most likely scorelines

#11-111.1%
#22-19.9%
#32-09.5%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
05.9%4.2%2.7%0.9%0.2%
18.7%11.1%5.3%1.9%0.5%
29.5%9.9%5.2%1.8%0.5%
36.2%6.5%3.4%1.2%0.3%
43.0%3.2%1.7%0.6%0.2%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate5.2%
Model fair odds19.20
Recorded CS odds13.00
Bookmaker implied7.7%
Model-market gap-2.5 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-32.3%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published4 Aug 2026 · 19:13 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 2-2

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.65View odds
Both teams to score — No2.10View odds
Over 2.51.60View odds
Under 2.52.20View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Warta Poznan versus Resovia Rzeszow to finish 2-2. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 0-1, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 2-2
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy