Skip to main content
English League Cup · Thursday, 6 August 2026

Bristol City v Walsall Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score3-08.5%
Expected goals2.17 – 0.83Bristol City / Walsall

Most likely scorelines

#12-011.7%
#21-010.0%
#31-19.8%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
05.8%3.4%1.7%0.5%0.1%
110.0%9.8%3.7%1.0%0.2%
211.7%9.7%4.0%1.1%0.2%
38.5%7.0%2.9%0.8%0.2%
44.6%3.8%1.6%0.4%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate8.5%
Model fair odds11.83
Recorded CS odds9.50
Bookmaker implied10.5%
Model-market gap-2.1 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-19.7%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published5 Aug 2026 · 18:35 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 3-0

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.83View odds
Both teams to score — No1.91View odds
Over 2.51.62View odds
Under 2.52.20View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Bristol City versus Walsall to finish 3-0. That scoreline implies No for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 0-1, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 3-0
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy