Skip to main content
Club Friendlies · Thursday, 6 August 2026

Monaco v Getafe Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score2-19.6%
Expected goals1.65 – 1.02Monaco / Getafe

Most likely scorelines

#11-112.8%
#21-010.2%
#32-19.6%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
08.1%5.8%3.6%1.2%0.3%
110.2%12.8%5.9%2.0%0.5%
29.4%9.6%4.9%1.7%0.4%
35.2%5.3%2.7%0.9%0.2%
42.2%2.2%1.1%0.4%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate9.6%
Model fair odds10.39
Recorded CS odds8.00
Bookmaker implied12.5%
Model-market gap-2.9 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-23.0%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published5 Aug 2026 · 18:35 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 2-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.75View odds
Both teams to score — No1.95View odds
Over 2.51.85View odds
Under 2.51.85View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Monaco versus Getafe to finish 2-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 1-0, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 2-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy