Skip to main content
Czech FNL · Friday, 7 August 2026

Prostejov v MFK Karvina Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-29.8%
Expected goals1.01 – 1.74Prostejov / MFK Karvina

Most likely scorelines

#11-112.8%
#21-29.8%
#30-29.7%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
08.0%9.6%9.7%5.6%2.5%
14.9%12.8%9.8%5.7%2.5%
23.2%5.6%4.9%2.8%1.2%
31.1%1.9%1.6%1.0%0.4%
40.3%0.5%0.4%0.2%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate9.8%
Model fair odds10.23
Recorded CS odds8.00
Bookmaker implied12.5%
Model-market gap-2.7 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-21.8%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published6 Aug 2026 · 19:20 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-2

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.75View odds
Both teams to score — No1.95View odds
Over 2.51.75View odds
Under 2.51.95View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Prostejov versus MFK Karvina to finish 1-2. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 1-2, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-2
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy