Skip to main content
Dutch Eerste Divisie · Friday, 7 August 2026

TOP Oss v NAC Breda Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-111.1%
Expected goals1.13 – 1.95TOP Oss / NAC Breda

Most likely scorelines

#11-111.1%
#21-29.9%
#30-28.8%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
05.6%8.0%8.8%5.7%2.8%
14.2%11.1%9.9%6.4%3.1%
22.9%5.7%5.6%3.6%1.8%
31.1%2.1%2.1%1.4%0.7%
40.3%0.6%0.6%0.4%0.2%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate11.1%
Model fair odds9.03
Recorded CS odds7.50
Bookmaker implied13.3%
Model-market gap-2.3 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-17.0%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published6 Aug 2026 · 19:20 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.60View odds
Both teams to score — No2.25View odds
Over 2.51.57View odds
Under 2.52.30View odds

Why this score?

The model projects TOP Oss versus NAC Breda to finish 1-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 1-2, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy