Skip to main content
Romanian Liga 1 · Friday, 7 August 2026

UTA Arad v Rapid Bucuresti Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-114.9%
Expected goals1.27 – 1.22UTA Arad / Rapid Bucuresti

Most likely scorelines

#11-114.9%
#20-010.3%
#31-08.5%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
010.3%8.1%6.1%2.5%0.8%
18.5%14.9%7.8%3.2%1.0%
26.7%8.2%5.0%2.0%0.6%
32.8%3.5%2.1%0.9%0.3%
40.9%1.1%0.7%0.3%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate14.9%
Model fair odds6.72
Recorded CS odds5.50
Bookmaker implied18.2%
Model-market gap-3.3 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-18.1%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published6 Aug 2026 · 19:20 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.75View odds
Both teams to score — No1.95View odds
Over 2.52.05View odds
Under 2.51.70View odds

Why this score?

The model projects UTA Arad versus Rapid Bucuresti to finish 1-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 0-0, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy