Skip to main content
William Hill Scottish League One · Saturday, 8 August 2026

East Fife v Cove Rangers Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score0-09.3%
Expected goals1.41 – 1.12East Fife / Cove Rangers

Most likely scorelines

#11-113.9%
#21-09.9%
#30-09.3%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
09.3%7.5%5.0%1.9%0.5%
19.9%13.9%7.0%2.6%0.7%
27.9%8.9%5.0%1.8%0.5%
33.7%4.2%2.3%0.9%0.2%
41.3%1.5%0.8%0.3%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate9.3%
Model fair odds10.71
Recorded CS odds8.50
Bookmaker implied11.8%
Model-market gap-2.4 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-20.6%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published7 Aug 2026 · 18:23 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 0-0

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.80View odds
Both teams to score — No1.95View odds
Over 2.52.00View odds
Under 2.51.73View odds

Why this score?

The model projects East Fife versus Cove Rangers to finish 0-0. That scoreline implies No for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 2-0, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 0-0
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy