Skip to main content
English National League North · Saturday, 8 August 2026

Marine v Macclesfield Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-29.2%
Expected goals1.15 – 1.53Marine / Macclesfield

Most likely scorelines

#11-113.7%
#21-29.2%
#30-18.9%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
08.5%8.9%8.0%4.1%1.6%
16.3%13.7%9.2%4.7%1.8%
24.5%6.9%5.3%2.7%1.0%
31.7%2.6%2.0%1.0%0.4%
40.5%0.8%0.6%0.3%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate9.2%
Model fair odds10.84
Recorded CS odds8.00
Bookmaker implied12.5%
Model-market gap-3.3 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-26.2%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published7 Aug 2026 · 18:23 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-2

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.70View odds
Both teams to score — No2.05View odds
Over 2.51.85View odds
Under 2.51.85View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Marine versus Macclesfield to finish 1-2. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 0-1, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-2
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy