Skip to main content
Swedish Allsvenskan · Saturday, 8 August 2026

Mjallby v Elfsborg Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-113.7%
Expected goals1.37 – 1.31Mjallby / Elfsborg

Most likely scorelines

#11-113.7%
#22-18.4%
#30-08.3%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
08.3%7.6%5.9%2.6%0.8%
18.1%13.7%8.0%3.5%1.1%
26.5%8.4%5.5%2.4%0.8%
32.9%3.8%2.5%1.1%0.4%
41.0%1.3%0.9%0.4%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate13.7%
Model fair odds7.30
Recorded CS odds6.00
Bookmaker implied16.7%
Model-market gap-3.0 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-17.8%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published7 Aug 2026 · 18:23 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.67View odds
Both teams to score — No2.10View odds
Over 2.51.85View odds
Under 2.51.85View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Mjallby versus Elfsborg to finish 1-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 0-1, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy