Skip to main content
French Ligue 2 · Saturday, 8 August 2026

Montpellier v Dijon Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-113.1%
Expected goals1.44 – 0.98Montpellier / Dijon

Most likely scorelines

#11-113.1%
#21-012.3%
#30-09.5%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
09.5%8.2%4.3%1.4%0.3%
112.3%13.1%6.1%2.0%0.5%
29.2%9.0%4.4%1.4%0.4%
34.4%4.3%2.1%0.7%0.2%
41.6%1.6%0.8%0.2%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate13.1%
Model fair odds7.65
Recorded CS odds6.00
Bookmaker implied16.7%
Model-market gap-3.6 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-21.5%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published7 Aug 2026 · 18:23 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.95View odds
Both teams to score — No1.80View odds
Over 2.52.15View odds
Under 2.51.65View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Montpellier versus Dijon to finish 1-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 1-1, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy