Skip to main content
English League Cup · Saturday, 8 August 2026

Norwich v MK Dons Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-110.8%
Expected goals1.92 – 1.00Norwich / MK Dons

Most likely scorelines

#11-110.8%
#21-010.0%
#32-010.0%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
05.8%5.0%2.7%0.9%0.2%
110.0%10.8%5.2%1.7%0.4%
210.0%9.9%4.9%1.6%0.4%
36.4%6.4%3.2%1.0%0.3%
43.1%3.0%1.5%0.5%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate10.8%
Model fair odds9.29
Recorded CS odds7.50
Bookmaker implied13.3%
Model-market gap-2.6 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-19.3%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published7 Aug 2026 · 18:23 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.75View odds
Both teams to score — No2.00View odds
Over 2.51.67View odds
Under 2.52.10View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Norwich versus MK Dons to finish 1-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 4-1, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy