Skip to main content
Brazilian Serie A · Sunday, 9 August 2026

Bahia v Vasco da Gama Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score2-19.4%
Expected goals1.56 – 1.11Bahia / Vasco da Gama

Most likely scorelines

#11-113.4%
#21-09.4%
#32-19.4%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
08.3%6.3%4.3%1.6%0.4%
19.4%13.4%6.6%2.5%0.7%
28.4%9.4%5.2%1.9%0.5%
34.4%4.9%2.7%1.0%0.3%
41.7%1.9%1.1%0.4%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate9.4%
Model fair odds10.68
Recorded CS odds8.00
Bookmaker implied12.5%
Model-market gap-3.1 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-25.1%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published8 Aug 2026 · 16:37 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 2-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.70View odds
Both teams to score — No2.05View odds
Over 2.51.85View odds
Under 2.51.85View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Bahia versus Vasco da Gama to finish 2-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 0-0, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 2-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy