Skip to main content
Norwegian Eliteserien · Sunday, 9 August 2026

Kristiansund v Molde Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-110.3%
Expected goals1.22 – 2.01Kristiansund / Molde

Most likely scorelines

#11-110.3%
#21-29.7%
#30-28.0%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
04.6%7.3%8.0%5.3%2.7%
14.2%10.3%9.7%6.5%3.3%
23.0%5.9%6.0%4.0%2.0%
31.2%2.4%2.4%1.6%0.8%
40.4%0.7%0.7%0.5%0.2%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate10.3%
Model fair odds9.69
Recorded CS odds8.00
Bookmaker implied12.5%
Model-market gap-2.2 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-17.4%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published8 Aug 2026 · 16:37 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.55View odds
Both teams to score — No2.30View odds
Over 2.51.44View odds
Under 2.52.50View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Kristiansund versus Molde to finish 1-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 2-1, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy