Skip to main content
Luxembourg National Division · Sunday, 9 August 2026

Swift Hesperange v Wiltz Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score2-18.9%
Expected goals1.55 – 1.34Swift Hesperange / Wiltz

Most likely scorelines

#11-113.9%
#22-18.9%
#30-07.9%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
07.9%5.2%5.0%2.2%0.7%
16.3%13.9%7.7%3.5%1.2%
26.7%8.9%6.0%2.7%0.9%
33.4%4.6%3.1%1.4%0.5%
41.3%1.8%1.2%0.5%0.2%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate8.9%
Model fair odds11.18
Recorded CS odds8.50
Bookmaker implied11.8%
Model-market gap-2.8 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-24.0%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published8 Aug 2026 · 16:37 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 2-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.53View odds
Both teams to score — No2.30View odds
Over 2.51.67View odds
Under 2.52.05View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Swift Hesperange versus Wiltz to finish 2-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 2-7, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 2-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy