Skip to main content
Swedish Superettan · Sunday, 9 August 2026

Varberg v Sandvikens IF Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score2-19.6%
Expected goals1.80 – 1.22Varberg / Sandvikens IF

Most likely scorelines

#11-111.8%
#22-19.6%
#32-07.9%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
06.0%4.9%3.6%1.5%0.4%
17.8%11.8%6.5%2.7%0.8%
27.9%9.6%5.9%2.4%0.7%
34.7%5.8%3.5%1.4%0.4%
42.1%2.6%1.6%0.6%0.2%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate9.6%
Model fair odds10.37
Recorded CS odds7.50
Bookmaker implied13.3%
Model-market gap-3.7 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-27.7%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published8 Aug 2026 · 16:37 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 2-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.57View odds
Both teams to score — No2.25View odds
Over 2.51.57View odds
Under 2.52.25View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Varberg versus Sandvikens IF to finish 2-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 0-1, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 2-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy