Skip to main content
Dutch Eerste Divisie · Monday, 10 August 2026

Jong AZ v FC Eindhoven Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-111.0%
Expected goals1.79 – 1.50Jong AZ / FC Eindhoven

Most likely scorelines

#11-111.0%
#22-19.0%
#31-27.5%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
04.8%4.6%4.2%2.1%0.8%
15.7%11.0%7.5%3.8%1.4%
26.0%9.0%6.7%3.4%1.3%
33.6%5.3%4.0%2.0%0.7%
41.6%2.4%1.8%0.9%0.3%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate11.0%
Model fair odds9.07
Recorded CS odds7.50
Bookmaker implied13.3%
Model-market gap-2.3 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-17.3%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published9 Aug 2026 · 18:37 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.44View odds
Both teams to score — No2.62View odds
Over 2.51.44View odds
Under 2.52.62View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Jong AZ versus FC Eindhoven to finish 1-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 0-1, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy