Skip to main content
English League Cup · Monday, 10 August 2026

Plymouth v Exeter City Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score2-19.9%
Expected goals2.18 – 1.00Plymouth / Exeter City

Most likely scorelines

#12-09.9%
#22-19.9%
#31-19.9%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
05.0%3.4%2.1%0.7%0.2%
18.3%9.9%4.5%1.5%0.4%
29.9%9.9%4.9%1.6%0.4%
37.2%7.2%3.6%1.2%0.3%
43.9%3.9%2.0%0.6%0.2%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate9.9%
Model fair odds10.12
Recorded CS odds7.50
Bookmaker implied13.3%
Model-market gap-3.5 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-25.9%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published9 Aug 2026 · 18:37 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 2-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.62View odds
Both teams to score — No2.15View odds
Over 2.51.50View odds
Under 2.52.40View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Plymouth versus Exeter City to finish 2-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 2-0, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 2-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy