Skip to main content
Swedish Superettan · Tuesday, 11 August 2026

Helsingborg v Varnamo Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score2-19.2%
Expected goals1.64 – 1.32Helsingborg / Varnamo

Most likely scorelines

#11-112.7%
#22-19.2%
#31-27.4%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
06.7%5.3%4.5%2.0%0.6%
17.0%12.7%7.4%3.2%1.1%
27.0%9.2%6.1%2.7%0.9%
33.8%5.0%3.3%1.5%0.5%
41.6%2.1%1.4%0.6%0.2%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate9.2%
Model fair odds10.86
Recorded CS odds8.50
Bookmaker implied11.8%
Model-market gap-2.6 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-21.7%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published10 Aug 2026 · 18:35 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 2-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.55View odds
Both teams to score — No2.30View odds
Over 2.51.62View odds
Under 2.52.20View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Helsingborg versus Varnamo to finish 2-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 1-2, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 2-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy