Skip to main content
UEFA Super Cup · Wednesday, 12 August 2026

PSG v Aston Villa Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-112.1%
Expected goals1.69 – 0.99PSG / Aston Villa

Most likely scorelines

#11-112.1%
#21-011.0%
#32-09.8%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
07.6%6.1%3.3%1.1%0.3%
111.0%12.1%5.7%1.9%0.5%
29.8%9.7%4.8%1.6%0.4%
35.5%5.5%2.7%0.9%0.2%
42.3%2.3%1.1%0.4%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate12.1%
Model fair odds8.24
Recorded CS odds7.00
Bookmaker implied14.3%
Model-market gap-2.2 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-15.1%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published11 Aug 2026 · 18:31 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.75View odds
Both teams to score — No1.95View odds
Over 2.51.85View odds
Under 2.51.85View odds

Why this score?

The model projects PSG versus Aston Villa to finish 1-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 2-1, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy