Skip to main content
Swedish Allsvenskan · Friday, 14 August 2026

Elfsborg v Vasteras Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-111.8%
Expected goals1.74 – 1.11Elfsborg / Vasteras

Most likely scorelines

#11-111.8%
#22-19.7%
#31-09.4%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
06.4%5.8%3.6%1.3%0.4%
19.4%11.8%6.2%2.3%0.6%
28.8%9.7%5.4%2.0%0.6%
35.1%5.6%3.1%1.2%0.3%
42.2%2.5%1.4%0.5%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate11.8%
Model fair odds8.47
Recorded CS odds7.00
Bookmaker implied14.3%
Model-market gap-2.5 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-17.3%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published13 Aug 2026 · 15:50 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.67View odds
Both teams to score — No2.10View odds
Over 2.51.73View odds
Under 2.52.05View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Elfsborg versus Vasteras to finish 1-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 3-0, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy