Skip to main content
Turkish Super Lig · Friday, 14 August 2026

Galatasaray v Corum Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score3-17.6%
Expected goals2.64 – 0.69Galatasaray / Corum

Most likely scorelines

#12-012.5%
#23-011.0%
#31-09.8%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
03.3%2.8%0.8%0.2%0.0%
19.8%6.2%2.2%0.5%0.1%
212.5%8.6%2.9%0.7%0.1%
311.0%7.6%2.6%0.6%0.1%
47.3%5.0%1.7%0.4%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate7.6%
Model fair odds13.24
Recorded CS odds11.00
Bookmaker implied9.1%
Model-market gap-1.5 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-16.9%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published13 Aug 2026 · 15:50 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 3-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Away12.00View odds
Both teams to score — Yes2.05View odds
Both teams to score — No1.70View odds
Over 2.51.44View odds
Under 2.52.62View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Galatasaray versus Corum to finish 3-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 2-2, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 3-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy