Skip to main content
Austrian Bundesliga · Friday, 14 August 2026

LASK Linz v Ried Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-110.8%
Expected goals1.90 – 0.97LASK Linz / Ried

Most likely scorelines

#11-110.8%
#21-010.5%
#32-010.2%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
06.0%5.2%2.7%0.9%0.2%
110.5%10.8%5.1%1.6%0.4%
210.2%9.9%4.8%1.6%0.4%
36.5%6.3%3.0%1.0%0.2%
43.1%3.0%1.4%0.5%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate10.8%
Model fair odds9.27
Recorded CS odds7.00
Bookmaker implied14.3%
Model-market gap-3.5 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-24.5%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published13 Aug 2026 · 15:50 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.75View odds
Both teams to score — No2.00View odds
Over 2.51.70View odds
Under 2.52.05View odds

Why this score?

The model projects LASK Linz versus Ried to finish 1-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 4-1, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy