Skip to main content
Norwegian Eliteserien · Friday, 14 August 2026

Rosenborg v Viking Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score2-26.9%
Expected goals1.63 – 1.69Rosenborg / Viking

Most likely scorelines

#11-110.7%
#21-28.4%
#32-18.1%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
04.4%5.3%5.2%2.9%1.2%
15.1%10.7%8.4%4.7%2.0%
24.8%8.1%6.9%3.9%1.6%
32.6%4.4%3.7%2.1%0.9%
41.1%1.8%1.5%0.9%0.4%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate6.9%
Model fair odds14.57
Recorded CS odds10.00
Bookmaker implied10.0%
Model-market gap-3.1 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-31.4%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published13 Aug 2026 · 15:50 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 2-2

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.40View odds
Both teams to score — No2.75View odds
Over 2.51.44View odds
Under 2.52.62View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Rosenborg versus Viking to finish 2-2. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 2-1, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 2-2
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy