Skip to main content
English Championship · Friday, 14 August 2026

Wolves v Blackburn Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score2-011.0%
Expected goals1.89 – 0.89Wolves / Blackburn

Most likely scorelines

#11-011.3%
#22-011.0%
#31-110.8%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
06.6%5.1%2.5%0.7%0.2%
111.3%10.8%4.7%1.4%0.3%
211.0%9.9%4.4%1.3%0.3%
37.0%6.2%2.8%0.8%0.2%
43.3%2.9%1.3%0.4%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate11.0%
Model fair odds9.06
Recorded CS odds7.00
Bookmaker implied14.3%
Model-market gap-3.2 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-22.7%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published13 Aug 2026 · 15:50 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 2-0

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.83View odds
Both teams to score — No1.85View odds
Over 2.51.75View odds
Under 2.51.95View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Wolves versus Blackburn to finish 2-0. That scoreline implies No for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 2-2, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 2-0
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy