Skip to main content
English Championship · Saturday, 15 August 2026

Bolton v Preston Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-114.2%
Expected goals1.43 – 1.15Bolton / Preston

Most likely scorelines

#11-114.2%
#20-09.3%
#31-09.1%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
09.3%7.0%5.0%1.9%0.6%
19.1%14.2%7.2%2.8%0.8%
27.7%8.9%5.1%2.0%0.6%
33.7%4.2%2.4%0.9%0.3%
41.3%1.5%0.9%0.3%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate14.2%
Model fair odds7.04
Recorded CS odds6.00
Bookmaker implied16.7%
Model-market gap-2.5 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-14.8%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published14 Aug 2026 · 20:00 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.73View odds
Both teams to score — No2.05View odds
Over 2.52.00View odds
Under 2.51.75View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Bolton versus Preston to finish 1-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 2-1, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy