Skip to main content
English National League South · Saturday, 15 August 2026

Dover v Slough Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score2-18.6%
Expected goals1.53 – 1.47Dover / Slough

Most likely scorelines

#11-112.8%
#22-18.6%
#31-28.2%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
06.6%5.8%5.4%2.6%1.0%
16.1%12.8%8.2%4.0%1.5%
25.8%8.6%6.3%3.1%1.1%
33.0%4.4%3.2%1.6%0.6%
41.1%1.7%1.2%0.6%0.2%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate8.6%
Model fair odds11.68
Recorded CS odds9.00
Bookmaker implied11.1%
Model-market gap-2.5 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-22.9%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published14 Aug 2026 · 20:00 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 2-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.50View odds
Both teams to score — No2.40View odds
Over 2.51.62View odds
Under 2.52.20View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Dover versus Slough to finish 2-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 5-3, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 2-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy