Skip to main content
Danish 1st Division · Saturday, 15 August 2026

Esbjerg v Hobro Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score2-19.4%
Expected goals1.65 – 1.24Esbjerg / Hobro

Most likely scorelines

#11-112.4%
#22-19.4%
#31-08.1%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
06.6%5.8%4.3%1.8%0.5%
18.1%12.4%7.0%2.9%0.9%
27.6%9.4%5.8%2.4%0.7%
34.2%5.2%3.2%1.3%0.4%
41.7%2.1%1.3%0.5%0.2%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate9.4%
Model fair odds10.65
Recorded CS odds8.00
Bookmaker implied12.5%
Model-market gap-3.1 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-24.9%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published14 Aug 2026 · 20:00 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 2-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.60View odds
Both teams to score — No2.20View odds
Over 2.51.67View odds
Under 2.52.05View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Esbjerg versus Hobro to finish 2-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 1-2, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 2-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy