Skip to main content
Brazilian Serie A · Saturday, 15 August 2026

Fluminense v Palmeiras Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-114.6%
Expected goals1.13 – 1.21Fluminense / Palmeiras

Most likely scorelines

#11-114.6%
#20-011.1%
#30-110.2%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
011.1%10.2%7.0%2.8%0.9%
19.4%14.6%8.0%3.2%1.0%
26.1%7.4%4.5%1.8%0.6%
32.3%2.8%1.7%0.7%0.2%
40.7%0.8%0.5%0.2%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate14.6%
Model fair odds6.83
Recorded CS odds5.50
Bookmaker implied18.2%
Model-market gap-3.5 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-19.5%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published14 Aug 2026 · 20:00 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-1

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.91View odds
Both teams to score — No1.80View odds
Over 2.52.25View odds
Under 2.51.60View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Fluminense versus Palmeiras to finish 1-1. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 3-2, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-1
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy