Skip to main content
Argentinian Primera Nacional · Saturday, 15 August 2026

Mitre v Guemes Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-014.4%
Expected goals1.39 – 0.77Mitre / Guemes

Most likely scorelines

#11-014.4%
#21-114.0%
#30-013.2%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
013.2%7.3%3.4%0.9%0.2%
114.4%14.0%4.7%1.2%0.2%
211.1%8.6%3.3%0.8%0.2%
35.2%4.0%1.5%0.4%0.1%
41.8%1.4%0.5%0.1%0.0%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate14.4%
Model fair odds6.92
Recorded CS odds5.00
Bookmaker implied20.0%
Model-market gap-5.6 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-27.8%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published14 Aug 2026 · 20:00 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-0

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes2.20View odds
Both teams to score — No1.62View odds
Over 2.52.50View odds
Under 2.51.44View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Mitre versus Guemes to finish 1-0. That scoreline implies No for BTTS and Under 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 1-1, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-0
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy