Skip to main content
English League 2 · Saturday, 15 August 2026

Newport v Rochdale Correct Score Prediction

Kick-off:

MODEL ESTIMATE

Score probability model

CSM-1.0
Published score1-28.7%
Expected goals1.17 – 1.37Newport / Rochdale

Most likely scorelines

#11-114.0%
#20-19.5%
#30-09.2%
View score probability matrix
Score probability model
Home goals ↓ / Away goals →01234
09.2%9.5%7.4%3.4%1.2%
17.9%14.0%8.7%4.0%1.4%
25.4%7.4%5.1%2.3%0.8%
32.1%2.9%2.0%0.9%0.3%
40.6%0.8%0.6%0.3%0.1%

Market-fitted Poisson + Dixon–Coles · Estimated model probabilities are fitted to recorded 1X2 and goal-market prices. They are not yet empirically calibrated probabilities and do not guarantee an outcome.

PRICE COMPARISON

Model vs market price

CSVI-1.0
Model estimate8.7%
Model fair odds11.54
Recorded CS odds9.00
Bookmaker implied11.1%
Model-market gap-2.4 pp
Price gap vs model fair price-22.0%

This is a mathematical comparison between the uncalibrated CSM-1.0 estimate and the recorded price. It is not a calibrated expected-value claim, guarantee or betting recommendation.

Prediction record

Published14 Aug 2026 · 20:00 GMT+0100

✓ Original forecast preserved · Original prediction: 1-2

Legacy / unverifiablePublication timing unavailable

Available market odds

Both teams to score — Yes1.75View odds
Both teams to score — No1.95View odds
Over 2.52.00View odds
Under 2.51.75View odds

Why this score?

The model projects Newport versus Rochdale to finish 1-2. That scoreline implies Yes for BTTS and Over 2.5 for the goals market. Confidence is recorded as Medium; this is a model output, not a guarantee. The recorded final score is 3-0, so the archived prediction can be checked against the outcome.

→ 1-2
Share tip
FacebookX

Shares the tip and page link — never the bookmaker link.

How to interpret this prediction

Correct score is a high-variance market. The projected score is a forecast, not a certainty. The companion markets below are derived consistently from the same projected scoreline.

Prediction methodology · Results methodology · Editorial policy